Herbicide selectivity and weed control in cowpea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v13i0.5414Keywords:
Vigna unguiculata. Weeds. Chemical control. Phytotoxicity.Abstract
Weeds negatively affect cowpea plants, causing reduced growth, delayed development and yield loss. The aim of this study was to assay selectivity and effectiveness of weed control herbicides in cowpea cropping field conditions. For selectivity evaluation, the herbicide S-metolachlor, was used pre-emergence (PRE), and carfentrazone-ethyl, clethodim, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, fluazifop-p-butyl and quizalofop-p-ethyl post-emergence (POST). In effectiveness evaluation, S-metolachlor (PRE), and carfentrazone-ethyl (POST), S-metolachlor in PRE and fluazifop-p-butyl (POST), clethodim, carfentrazone-ethyl and clethodim, fenoxapropp-ethyl, carfentrazone-ethyl and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, fluazifop-p-butyl, carfentrazone-ethyl and fluazifop-pbutyl, quizalofop-p-ethyl and carfentrazone-ethyl and quizalofop-p-ethyl (POST). Two controls were included, one with weeding at 15 and 35 days after sowing (DAS) and the other without weed control. Carfentrazone-ethyl caused mild phytotoxicity in plants seven days after application, but did not reduce yield (2337 kg ha-1). The levels of weed control and productivity obtained with S-metolachlor alone or in association with carfentrazoneethyl or fluazifop-p-butyl, associated or not with carfentrazone-ethyl, were similar to those obtained with weeds. Spraying with carfentrazone-ethyl alone resulted in low control effectiveness and reduced yield (1511 kg ha-1). Weed interference during the crop cycle reduced yield by 77% (531 kg ha-1). The selectivity and effectiveness obtained with the herbicides should be considered as an agronomic and economically-viable.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I declare on my behalf and on behalf of the other authors that I represent in the act of submitting this article, to REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE that: • 1. The content of the article is the result of original data and not published or submitted to other journals . • 2. In addition to the lead author, all co-authors participated sufficiently in the work to make public their respective responsibilities for the content. • 3. In case of acceptance of the article, the authors agree that the copyright referring to it will become the exclusive property of Revista Agro@mbiente On-line, any reproduction, total or partial, in any other part or means of dissemination is prohibited, printed or electronic, without the prior and necessary authorization being requested and, if obtained, acknowledgments must be made to the Revista Agro@mbiente On-line of the Centro de Ciências Agrárias/UFRR.